davidrw 2005-08-07 16:03:24-04
    jZed (or anyone) did you see 481726 and replies? Any reason that a "GROUP BY" sql statement wouldn't work w/DBD::CSV ?
bart 2005-08-07 16:05:53-04
    Because it didn't get implemented?
castaway 2005-08-07 16:06:22-04
    always a good reason ;)
davidrw 2005-08-07 16:08:10-04
    not implemented? doh! is that a guess or a fact?
davidrw 2005-08-07 16:08:59-04
    davidrw goes to skim DBD::CSV docs for known bugs/limitations
davidrw 2005-08-07 16:10:24-04
    davidrw doesn't find anything obvious in DBD::CSV or DBD::File pod
Zaxo 2005-08-07 16:12:43-04
    since there isn't a db daemon managing things, constructs like that have to be written from scratch in DBD::CSV
castaway 2005-08-07 16:13:25-04
    right
Corion 2005-08-07 16:13:41-04
    Hmmm. "Group By" would likely be a hash filter sitting between the row-scanner and the aggregator function(s)
Corion 2005-08-07 16:14:03-04
    ... so it "shouldn't be hard". But then, what do I know about DBDs :)
davidrw 2005-08-07 16:14:24-04
    hmm.. true.
davidrw 2005-08-07 16:15:15-04
    i wonder if any other non-db-daemon DBD:: modules implement GROUP BY?
Zaxo 2005-08-07 16:16:32-04
    Berkeley might, but I don't know
Corion 2005-08-07 16:17:55-04
    davidrw: SQLite does. :)
davidrw 2005-08-07 16:18:42-04
    ah. y, i knew that -- i use it a lot :)
davidrw 2005-08-07 16:18:52-04
    it's been a slow lazy sunday ...