Re: Re: New Display Types

[Juerd]

The "print" format is a nice format for viewing in the browser. ... (Oh, and "print" format when posting/previewing would be nice too.)

You *could* of course just adjust the default layout if you like it better when it's clean:

TABLE[width="100%"][cellpadding="0"],    /* top bar */
TD[width="20%"],                         /* nodelets */
TD[valign="middle"][align="right"],      /* navigation */
#footer                                  /* footer */
{ display: none; }

- Yes, I reinvent wheels.
- Spam: Visit eurotraQ.

[Abigail-II]

Changing the layout doesn't remove things. ;-) I don't mind losing the advertisement, or the nodelets when viewing posts. But I like being notified about followups at some place, so removing the nodelets everywhere isn't an option for me (and I don't tend to visit the front page, the only page for which you can get a different set of nodelets).

As for the CSS, neither the FAQ nor the user settings page provides a link with useful information (e.g. the structure of the page), and I don't feel like reverse engineering.

Abigail

[Juerd]

Changing the layout doesn't remove things.

What exactly do you think display: none; does? :)

I don't mind losing the advertisement, or the nodelets when viewing posts. But I like being notified about followups at some place, so removing the nodelets everywhere isn't an option for me

.oO( External server side script that outputs CSS based on the referer )
But it would be nice if someone added lots of id and class attributes...

As for the CSS, neither the FAQ nor the user settings page provides a link with useful information (e.g. the structure of the page),

...and documented it.

and I don't feel like reverse engineering.

It's just a quick look at the source code. Regexes are harder.

- Yes, I reinvent wheels.
- Spam: Visit eurotraQ.