in reply to Re: Encapsulation through stringification - a variation on flyweight objects
in thread Encapsulation through stringification - a variation on flyweight objects
Ok. I'm missing something when it comes to encapsulation. Why on earth would you want to prevent Bar from accessing attributes it inherited from Foo? That's always been something I didn't understand in C++ - why private attributes were not inherited ...
------
We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.
Don't go borrowing trouble. For programmers, this means Worry only about what you need to implement.
Please remember that I'm crufty and crochety. All opinions are purely mine and all code is untested, unless otherwise specified.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Encapsulation through stringification - a variation on flyweight objects
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Apr 02, 2003 at 16:34 UTC |
In Section
Meditations