in reply to Perl RSS aggregator
Why MySQL and not PostgreSQL?
update: To those that downvoted this posting, just be aware that you'll be seeing more just like this one. PostgreSQL is horribly under-known, and I'm going to make sure that every casual mention of MySQL has PostgreSQL mentioned somewhere in the thread. MySQL has had its day. PostgreSQL is now leading in terms of functionality and support, not to mention having a much better license structure.
-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.
update: To those that downvoted this posting, just be aware that you'll be seeing more just like this one. PostgreSQL is horribly under-known, and I'm going to make sure that every casual mention of MySQL has PostgreSQL mentioned somewhere in the thread. MySQL has had its day. PostgreSQL is now leading in terms of functionality and support, not to mention having a much better license structure.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^2: Perl RSS aggregator
by Tommy (Chaplain) on Dec 09, 2004 at 01:51 UTC | |
by davorg (Chancellor) on Dec 09, 2004 at 09:17 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Dec 09, 2004 at 22:02 UTC | |
Re^2: Perl RSS aggregator
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 15, 2013 at 20:33 UTC | |
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 16, 2013 at 07:13 UTC |
In Section
Cool Uses for Perl