http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=577245


in reply to Re^3: Catalyst, Jifty MVCs too "expensive"...feasible alternative?
in thread Catalyst, Jifty MVCs too "expensive"...feasible alternative?

I noticed Catalyst is pretty good to go as far as that goes. I'm thinking Catalyst is the way to go for me, Jifty seems a bit restricted. I could write a base framework for the small apps in C::A, then do all my big stuff with Catalyst. Thanks for the definition :-)

meh.
  • Comment on Re^4: Catalyst, Jifty MVCs too "expensive"...feasible alternative?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Catalyst, Jifty MVCs too "expensive"...feasible alternative?
by markjugg (Curate) on Oct 09, 2006 at 21:42 UTC
    URL dispatching is available with CGI::Application, it available through CGI::Application::Dispatch. That's the trend with CGI::Application: less weight built-in by default, but lots of options for extensions and plug-ins.