http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=579149


in reply to using parallel processing to concatenate a string, where order of concatenation doesn't matter

Try this. I've used a randomly variable 'work pause', as if this is constant, the threads will obviously finish in the same order as they started.

Update: Applied locks per ikegami's post below.

#! perl -slw use strict; use threads; use threads::shared; my $content : shared = ''; sub concatenate_parallel { my $letter = shift; sleep 1 + rand 2; ## Do stuff that takes time { lock $content; $content .= $letter; } } print scalar localtime; my @threads = map{ threads->create( \&concatenate_parallel, $_ ) } 'a' + .. 'c'; $_->join for @threads; print $content; print scalar localtime; __END__ c:\test>579015 Wed Oct 18 18:01:20 2006 cab Wed Oct 18 18:01:22 2006 c:\test>579015 Wed Oct 18 18:01:24 2006 bca Wed Oct 18 18:01:26 2006 c:\test>579015 Wed Oct 18 18:01:27 2006 abc Wed Oct 18 18:01:29 2006 c:\test>579015 Wed Oct 18 18:01:30 2006 abc Wed Oct 18 18:01:32 2006

If you don't like the shared buffer being passed to the threads through closure--it smacks of globals--then you could use this version that passes a reference to the shared buffer to the threads as an argument and dereferences it when appending:

#! perl -slw use strict; use threads; use threads::shared; sub concatenate_parallel { my( $contentRef, $letter ) = @_; sleep 1 + rand 2; ## Do stuff that takes time { lock $contentRef; $$contentRef .= $letter for 1 .. 1e4; } } my $content : shared = ''; my $contentRef = \$content; print scalar localtime; my @threads = map{ threads->create( \&concatenate_parallel, $contentRef, $_ ); } 'a' .. 'z'; $_->join for @threads; print $content; print scalar localtime; __END__ c:\test>579015 Thu Oct 19 00:33:11 2006 cbefghlmqsvwadijknoprtuxyz Thu Oct 19 00:33:13 2006

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.