http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=682283


in reply to Re^4: Developing Perl against proprietary interfaces
in thread Developing Perl against proprietary interfaces

Yikes! Was this node down-voted because somebody really doesn't like SWIG, because I defended my original post, because I elided the complexities of the interface, or for some other reason? I didn't mean to step on toes, here.

--
Wade
  • Comment on Re^5: Developing Perl against proprietary interfaces

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Developing Perl against proprietary interfaces
by Anonymous Monk on Apr 23, 2008 at 03:28 UTC
    Only the person who voted knows, and they're not saying. But then you knew that already.
[reply]
Re^6: Developing Perl against proprietary interfaces
by samtregar (Abbot) on Apr 23, 2008 at 16:58 UTC
    Try not to take voting personally. Sometimes people down-vote just because they disagree with what you're saying. Maybe they agree with me about swig being mostly a waste of time.

    -sam

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom