Re^4: Generate the perl sequence 1, 11, 111, ....

in reply to Re^3: Generate the perl sequence 1, 11, 111, ....
in thread Generate the perl sequence 1, 11, 111, ....

Hello all, This is my very first post/reply to perlmonks.org :)

I personally believe, then, in addition to the Perl-specific points addressed by ikegami (which I was about to point out myself...) that as a behavioural rule you should have posted your reply not as a comment to a more or less random entry of this thread, but as one to the root node because it anwers the latter not the former.

--
If you can't understand the incipit, then please check the IPB Campaign.

Comment on Re^4: Generate the perl sequence 1, 11, 111, .... Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Generate the perl sequence 1, 11, 111, .... by matrixmadhan (Beadle) on Oct 14, 2008 at 08:41 UTC
Please pardon my ignorance. Only after replying to another reply - I realized that I should not have done that instead it should have been a direct reply. In most of the forums there isn't any concept of direct/indirect replies, so I was not aware of that. Next time, I will make sure about direct or indirect reply accordingly before posting. Sorry again.	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom