in reply to Re: Choose a maximum for Rep
in thread Choose a maximum for Rep
The reason I came up with this is because I find some nodes worthwhile, just not that worthwhile.
I disagree that votes become more or less valuable. They're as valuable as you think they are. Another option is if you vote ++<10 and it's already there, you don't spend a vote.Several monks actually -- votes that are at certain levels because they feel that the rep has exceeded the actual worth.
Sometimes you want to vote on a node just to see the rep and this would allow that.
Of course you could extend the logic so that a vote with a cap of 10 would -- a node that already has 20, or set up some mathamatical expresion if you want to get more complicated.
Anyway, it's just an idea. I'm not attached to it.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: Choose a maximum for Rep
by chipmunk (Parson) on May 25, 2001 at 07:28 UTC | |
Re: Re: Choose a maximum for Rep
by footpad (Abbot) on May 25, 2001 at 20:49 UTC | |
by tye (Sage) on May 25, 2001 at 21:47 UTC | |
by footpad (Abbot) on May 25, 2001 at 22:10 UTC | |
by tye (Sage) on May 25, 2001 at 23:24 UTC |
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion