in reply to Re^13: regexp class (no bugs)
in thread re: regexp class
if you are going to go to silly extremes, you could have gone further.No, you could not go further.
Golfed code in no way implies reducing functionality. It should still do the same as the original code. It should still pass the test suite.
That's obviously not true when you reduce your program to no code at all.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^15: regexp class (no bugs)
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 04, 2011 at 09:27 UTC | |
by JavaFan (Canon) on Sep 04, 2011 at 09:34 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 04, 2011 at 09:38 UTC | |
| |
Re^15: regexp class (no bugs)
by Logicus (Initiate) on Sep 14, 2011 at 23:52 UTC | |
by JavaFan (Canon) on Sep 15, 2011 at 09:28 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 15, 2011 at 09:45 UTC | |
by Logicus (Initiate) on Sep 18, 2011 at 22:27 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 18, 2011 at 22:56 UTC | |
|
In Section
Meditations