Re^2: Web::Magic 0.005

in reply to Re: Web::Magic 0.005
in thread Web::Magic 0.005

Not that I disagree with you, but I wouldn't want to write tests like that, even with a DSL -- I'd rather fireup HTTP::Proxy or selenium or WWW::Mechanize::Firefox, and record a session in my firefox

Comment on Re^2: Web::Magic 0.005

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Web::Magic 0.005 by jdrago999 (Pilgrim) on Jan 30, 2012 at 19:00 UTC
Not that I disagree with you, but I wouldn't want to write tests like that, even with a DSL -- I'd rather fireup HTTP::Proxy or selenium or WWW::Mechanize::Firefox, and record a session in my firefox It has been a while since I did that kind of testing...is HTTP::Recorder still the state-of-the-art or have things moved forward in the last 6 years? UPDATE: I just noticed there is a newer release as of July 2011.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^3: Web::Magic 0.005
by jdrago999 (Pilgrim) on Jan 30, 2012 at 19:00 UTC

Not that I disagree with you, but I wouldn't want to write tests like that, even with a DSL -- I'd rather fireup HTTP::Proxy or selenium or WWW::Mechanize::Firefox, and record a session in my firefox

It has been a while since I did that kind of testing...is HTTP::Recorder still the state-of-the-art or have things moved forward in the last 6 years?

UPDATE: I just noticed there is a newer release as of July 2011.

[reply]

In Section Cool Uses for Perl