Re: possible to bake LD_LIBRARY

Hmm, LD_LIBRARY_PATH shows its being used to set Config#ldlibpthname, which sadly, Makefile.PL/Build.PL do not appear to use.

So editing ldlibpthname probably won't work.

But editing lddlflags, ldflags ought to work to add paths which the compiler ought-to bake

Comment on Re: possible to bake LD_LIBRARY_PATH in perl(1)?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: possible to bake LD_LIBRARY_PATH in perl(1)? by Anonymous Monk on Apr 20, 2012 at 08:09 UTC
On a related note, see also Should I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH?, Why LD_LIBRARY_PATH is bad	[reply]
Re^2: possible to bake LD_LIBRARY_PATH in perl(1)? by Anonymous Monk on Apr 20, 2012 at 08:01 UTC
Right you are about the editing; I posted too soon (2d reply). I will try `ld*flags` & `usesitecustomize` next time I get the chance. Thanks much.	[reply] [d/l] [select]