http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=1023817


in reply to perl v5.16 bug?

I suspect you haven't been exposed to this bit of perl pop culture , enjoy :) from Good Advice and Maxims for Programmers

#11943 Ah yes, and you are the first person to have noticed this bug since 1987.Sure.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: perl v5.16 bug? (:sure:)
by ikegami (Pope) on Mar 16, 2013 at 19:06 UTC
    Nit: That the feature was introduced in 2011 (not 1987) and that it's still marked as experimental changes the dynamic somewhat.