http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=25227


in reply to Make Supersearch more obvious

I would like to add one more thing, we should beable to vote more than once on a node.
Considering I did not know about Super Search I find this node very helpfull in it self and should get more than one of my votes :)



lindex 
/****************************/
  jason@gost.net, wh@ckz.org
    http://jason.gost.net
/*****************************/

[download]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: Make Supersearch more obvious
by atl (Pilgrim) on Jul 31, 2000 at 14:42 UTC
    On a first glance I'd say yes, it's unfair that I can give a good node and an excellent node only the same vote-up.

    But there might be a problem when it comes to flame threads, and god knows this site has some (I have only the link to this one handy, but there are more). Consider what might be going on if some monks might start a showdown with their votes ...

    No offence meant to anyone!

    It's just that one man one vote is ok, in my own humble opinion.

    Andreas

    P.S.: No objections against kudra's suggestion. I agree.

[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion