Re^2: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing)

This node falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

Comment on Re^2: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Perl 6 ... dead? (flame) by Pragma (Scribe) on Sep 02, 2004 at 04:28 UTC
You raise a good point, Wassercrats. Although we're accustomed to protecting things of value, for instance, gold, diamonds, and Munch paintings, we must not forget that things deemed harmful to humanity, such as nuclear waste, minefields, and Michael Jackson, must also be guarded to prevent the curious, naive, or stupid from injuring themselves through accidental or intentional contact with them. In other words, if compiled Perl 6 means that you nobody will ever have to set eyes upon your source code again, then I wish the Perl 6 developers godspeed in their task. ps: B::Bytecode can compile your Perl source code today. What are you waiting for? Considered: DaWolf delete: Flamebait. Not useful at all for the parent node or the discussion Unconsidered: ysth enough keep votes - Keep/Edit/Delete: 19/1/9	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re^3: Perl 6 ... dead? (no, just convalescing) by Anonymous Monk on Sep 01, 2004 at 07:41 UTC
Protect from what? Reuse? No. Reading? No. You mean protect your comments? I guess.	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

In Section Meditations