in reply to Re: Musing on Monastery Content
in thread Musing on Monastery Content
But, more important, I believe such posting SHOULD be tantamount to irrevocable waiver of any right to revoke what tye calls "license to distribute."
Hence, tye's "'legal notice'" deserves support and action... even if some could argue that it smacks of a "shrink-wrap license" scheme.
Tangent: I quibble -- nay, even quarrel-- with this one section of Old Gray Bear's presention:
On the one hand, I have to support X in his wish to remove his writings from general circulation. He wrote them. There was no 'license' attached to it releasing the words and ideas to the Public Domain. He is able to edit the node content at will. His retraction is merely a severe form of editing, but it is His Right.
- Why (this is a serious question; neither troll nor flame) do you feel obliged "to support X..." re removal?
Legal reasons; human rights? some other consideration? - Retraction may be "merely a severe form of editing" but in light of the fact that doing so reduces or destroys the value of others' contributions, I can't agree that it is "His Right."
I suspect we'd be well served with the view that the right to edit one's comments in a thread to which others have contributed should be restricted to strikethrough and insert. The would-be retracter can easily enough use available mechanisms (css such as:
&nbgsp; <style="font-family: serif; color: #bo400f; background-color: transparent;">
might work) to highlight the retraction/disavowal of a comment which s/he later decided is untenable (in the light of further reflection or new evidence -- perhaps even an illuminating comment farther down the same thread).
Posted, knowing that some flaw in my current thinking may someday have me wishing I could not merely retract, but could actually delete this rambling. <G>
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^3: Musing on Monastery Content
by apotheon (Deacon) on Oct 19, 2004 at 01:37 UTC | |
by ww (Archbishop) on Oct 19, 2004 at 16:11 UTC | |
by apotheon (Deacon) on Oct 19, 2004 at 18:51 UTC |