in reply to Re^3: blandness is the problem, not plagarism
in thread XP whore
Oh, okay: "slashdot karma" and "perlmonks xp" are roughly equivalent concepts. Points assigned to a poster by a community of readers.
Slashdot was one of the first places to experiment with such things, which is why the slashdot experience is somewhat relevant to this sort of discussion.
Oh, and it appears that "reputation server" is a slightly more obscure term than I thought it was... there's no wikipedia entry for it yet, for example (I'll have to put it on my list). The idea is something like the way ebay works: you vote people you deal with up or down, and other people can use this to decide if they want to deal with them. Note that in the ebay context, "reputation" is a serious business, it's not just points in a game.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^5: blandness is the problem, not plagarism
by demerphq (Chancellor) on May 23, 2007 at 16:51 UTC | |
by tilly (Archbishop) on Mar 13, 2009 at 05:56 UTC | |
by planetscape (Chancellor) on Mar 13, 2009 at 16:42 UTC | |
by Lawliet (Curate) on Mar 13, 2009 at 18:39 UTC | |
Re^5: blandness is the problem, not plagarism
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 14, 2009 at 14:17 UTC |
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion