...and with CLass::Std

Thought so. Unfortunately the same seems to apply to Class::Std, which we also use more often since PBP rules here...

Bye
PetaMem All Perl: MT, NLP, NLU

Comment on ...and with CLass::Std

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: ...and with CLass::Std by stvn (Monsignor) on Jan 18, 2008 at 17:02 UTC
Unfortunately the same seems to apply to Class::Std, which we also use more often since PBP rules here You might want to try to get away from Class::Std, as I pointed out here, Class::Std has 56 outstanding Bugs some over 2 years old and many which are quite serious. And it also seems to be no longer maintained (last upload was Feb. 2006). Again, with all due respect to TheDamian, Class::Std is starting to look like abandonware to me. Of course I am going to recommend Moose as a replacement, but I am a little biased on that. Of course Moose classes won't survive a deparse either, but we have MooseX::Storage for that. Also work is currently being done on an optimizing compiler for Moose part of which is a mechanism for storing metaclass objects on disk, and since a metaclass is nothing but an object which models a class, that is pretty close to a "deparsed class". -stvn	[reply]
Re^2: ...and with CLass::Std by jdporter (Paladin) on Feb 05, 2021 at 13:33 UTC
It appears that maintenance of Class::Std has been taken over by chorny, with the most recent update being 2015. A number of open issues have been resolved.	[reply]