note
BrowserUk
<blockquote><i>e.g. “25 days vs. 1.3 seconds” but, honestly, I don’t think anyone seriously benefits from such outlandish comparisons. </i></blockquote>
<p>What is so "outlandish" about pointing out the difference that using a O(N<sup>2</sup>) proposal, instead of one of the three O(N) solutions already suggested, would make?
<p>It is exactly these kinds of untested postulations you've become famous for. Perhaps it was ...
<p>Oh! BTW, after further assessment, that 25 days projection proves to be a gross underestimate.
<div class="pmsig"><div class="pmsig-171588">
<hr />
<font size=1 >
<div>With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'</div>
<div>Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.</div>
<div>"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". </div>
<div>In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
</div>
</font>
</div></div>
1015388
1015432