note
Anonymous Monk
<p><i> I don't have a problem with "Perl Golf" short solutions ...:-) </i>
<p> There is nothing even remotely "Perl Golf" about that, IMHO that is practically a slur against perl, practically anti-perl-propaganda :)
<p><i> However its obvious the OP (Original Poster) is not talking about those basic sorts of problems. </i>
<P> Sure its not :) Take for example [href://http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/LinuxMag/col39.html|Watching long processes through CGI (Aug 02)], nothing particularly basic about it, sure its got 2 functions, but most of the code isn't in functions, less than 100 lines
<p> Or take for example [href://http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-CSV_XS/MANIFEST|Text-CSV_XS-0.97/examples/csv2xls], 200 lines, one function( usage(), mostly string/heredoc)
<p> Its easy to well past 1000 lines with this type of program, and its obvious to me this is the type of program the OP is talking about -- doesn't need modules or Test:: anything
1031493
1031514
7