<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="104207" title="New sections and move one" created="2001-08-12 03:30:06" updated="2005-07-21 01:27:59">
<type id="1036">
monkdiscuss</type>
<author id="89231">
aquacade</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
Please move Perl News from top to [leftovers].&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Please consider adding three new sections "New2Perl", "Perl 6", and "Subroutine Library" to the top.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
I think these new sections would better classify some continuously recurring questions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The "Subroutine Library" section is not like the snippets or Code Catacombs (but perhaps belongs under the catacombs).  It would be classified, ready to use 'cut &amp; paste'-able subroutines anyone can call for frequently asked how-to-do-its!  The Monks could even bake-off subroutines and the first, best submission left standing as the Monks best efforts (based on XP?) gets promoted into the Perl Monks Subroutine Library.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think there are a lot of wasted-cycles by higher level Monks reanswering the same questions over and over and over.  I've searched this site for solutions, but until I discovered SuperSearch my searches were empty or returned too many hits.  Using SuperSearch I still chase lots of links, I'm mostly looking for code that already works.  It's hard to arbitrate one suggestion over another and usually they are snippets that I cannot always understand how to incorporate.  I realize we cannot make a subroutine for every situation, but having some library of reusable code would help newer users. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW I'd like to see someone spend time reorganizing the sublinks in Code Catacombs in ASCIIbetical order.  A few sublinks are sorted, most links sublinks are not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for your time and consideration!
&lt;p&gt;&lt;FONT face=Beanie color="#0080ff" size=4&gt;
..::::::&amp;nbsp;aquacade&amp;nbsp;::::::..&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</field>
</data>
</node>
