note
rob_au
A couple of things that stood out with this geek stylecode ... <i>Hrmmm, geek and style, is that a contradiction of terms in itself?</i> ... Anyhow ...<p>
<ul><li>The <code>++</code> denotation within the whitespace around operators seems without merit - This is because while the prefix and postfix increment operands perform the same task, their order differs and as such, depending on the code, are not stylistically interchangeable.<p></li>
<li>The <code>==</code> denotation within the whitespace around operators is duplicated by the <code>gt</code> denotation because in fact, after all, <code>==</code> is just another equality test.<p></li>
<li>The variable and sub names denotation is quite neat, although I think the parentheses for plurality is redundant if <code>px</code> would suffice (where <code>x</code> is the descriptor code to apply to scalars, hashes and arrays) - For example, <code>Vp(s0h0a0)</code> should be able to be reduced to <code>Vp0</code>.</li>
</ul> <p>
Very nifty though ... [Juerd]++
<p> <p>
<tt><font size="-1">I4 Os1 ;0 S,><.><+>**<=><&&><and><gt> B1<br>
L1 C2 P2 N< R1 Vc1a2p(s0h0a0)r0d2 Hsw2T sub-main</font></tt>
154071
154071