<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="206333" title="Re: On human nature" created="2002-10-18 11:40:23" updated="2005-08-12 18:10:24">
<type id="11">
note</type>
<author id="10620">
joe++</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
Hmm, interesting fact: my first impression of [id://9073|Merlyn]'s comment was not offensive at all. I mean, I happen to have read the appropriate Apocalypse about dereferencing List/Hash elements. For me, Merlyn's comment just looks like an enlightenment on the subject rather than saying "you're plain wrong" - a way of giving help and improve indpendent judgement at once. &lt;p&gt;On the other hand, if you're just here for some cut-and-paste coding, this way of thinking is likely a mere distraction.
&lt;p&gt;
Anyway, from [http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2001/05/03/wall.html|Apocalypse 2] (not the main discussion about interpolation, but it's mentioned here as well):
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Note for those who are thinking we should just stick with Perl 5 interpolation rules: We have to allow % to introduce interpolation now because individual hash values are no longer named with $foo{$bar}, but rather %foo{$bar}. So we might as well allow interpolation of complete hashes.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Conclusion: I don't think this discussion is worth a [id://206311|standard reply disclaimer block] ;-)
&lt;p&gt;-- &lt;br&gt;
Cheers, [id://10620|Joe]&lt;/p&gt;</field>
<field name="root_node">
205137</field>
<field name="parent_node">
205582</field>
</data>
</node>
