note Adam You know, you are right. I had thought I had done it in the right order, but I didn't... I screwed that up. I guess I would have to use:<code> @_=(1);L:for(2..100){$i=0;while(@_>++$i){next L if!($_%$_[$i])}push@_,$_} </code> which uses 2 more chars. Sigh. <p>UPDATE: I can do it with one less char then above, but still too many.:<code> @_=(1);L:for(2..100){$i=-@_;while(++$i){next L if!($_%$_[$i])}push@_,$_} </code> <font size=-1> Yes, I lie awake at night thinking about this stuff. No, not really. But when I get started thinking about it, I have a hard time stopping. But I doubt I'm alone in that disease. :)</font> 20633 20724