note crazyinsomniac A [patchcomment] nodetype is in order then (smells like a good idea to me). A few [pmdev]ils have become frustruated with just waiting around without any consideration/explanation of why their patches were rejected, thinking that their work is for nothing ( is it because most gods aren't that active, or whatever?). It's a shame to have [pmdev]ils lose interest (btw - I sympathise with the [gods], it is a tough job, I know what it's like). I say we implement patch comments regardless of how this 1/5th god idea turns out (<big>calling all [pmdev]ils</big>: all this needs is a [patchcomment] nodetype, [patchcomment display page], [patchcomment edit page], and a patch for [patch display page] to include the patchcomments for that particular patch, and a addapatch form -- if you need help/ideas, ask away -- actually, you could get away with simply editing [patch display page] to include a form for creating nodes of type note, with the root_node set to that particular patch id -- which is better?). BTW, any ideas on when the next, if any, batch of gods is coming out? (it's been so long since it's been mentioned/discussed, I completely forgot if any were scheduled to happen).   <TABLE CELLPADDING=0 CELLSPACING=3 BORDER=0 BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF"><TR><TD><a href="/index.pl?node=crazyinsomniac&lastnode_id=1072">______crazyinsomniac_____________________________</a> <TT><A HREF="http://www.ozzyosbourne.com/">Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most.</A></TT> <A HREF="http://www.divisionbyzero.com/burningman"><TT>perl -e "$q=$_;map({chr unpack qq;H*;,$_}split(q;;,q*H*));print;$q/$q;" </TT></A></TD></TR></TABLE> 242314 242396