<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="450256" title="Re^3: Why use strict is good, and barewords are bad" created="2005-04-21 21:39:50" updated="2005-07-08 06:45:12">
<type id="11">
note</type>
<author id="373533">
jhourcle</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
&lt;readmore&gt;&lt;p&gt;So barewords were introduced with the assumption subroutine calls would always have amperands -- and as hindsight works so well, we can all see what a bad assumption that was.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(besides, you said 'Presuming no "use strict" (or the days of Perl3)')&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; ... and I'm a newbie -- I learned from &lt;strike&gt;Matt's Script Archive&lt;/strike&gt; the llama book in um...1994?  1995? using Perl 4.  I've never used Perl 3.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/readmore&gt;</field>
<field name="root_node">
450080</field>
<field name="parent_node">
450250</field>
</data>
</node>
