<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="46552" title="Suggestion/Requests." created="2000-12-14 00:59:37" updated="2005-08-10 16:35:39">
<type id="1036">
monkdiscuss</type>
<author id="29772">
damian1301</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
Well earlier I collected suggestions to improve the site in the hope that [Vroom] sees this. Note: Some of these suggestions may or may not be my ideas, I just wanted to compile the best and a few of my own to better the site. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;B&gt;1&lt;/b&gt;. [Craft] and [Code].  Two sections identical in every way except one logs them in categories.  Alot of people over the time that [damian1301|I]'ve been here have suggested that they be combined to make a super Code Catacombs Section. I, for one, am in favor of this. [damian1301|I] truthfully don't like that [damian1301|I] have to search around the Last posts of [Craft] to find something say...using LWP modules (Though LWP isn't that hard to find around here :-).&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;

&lt;b&gt;2&lt;/b&gt;. Have a "/msg for beginners" explaining where to go for help using &amp;lt;code&amp;gt; and where to post questions and other stuff.  This would reduce confusion and stop some easy Chatterbox questions.  This has been requested by another user.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;

&lt;B&gt;3&lt;/b&gt;.  In a very recent post arose the issue of whether or not to add two new levels. [damian1301|I] think that this would be a good idea and that the two levels should already be something related to the current rating system. For this [damian1301|I] have (and many others) suggested Angel &amp; Archangel (Archangel being the highest).  [Merlyn], [Ovid], and [tilly] are all pretty far over the level of saint. This would give them something to strive for while helping others.  It would also give us little people a higher goal to achieve someday (hopefully).&lt;br&gt;&lt;BR&gt;

&lt;b&gt;4&lt;/b&gt;.  A couple weeks ago [damian1301|I] was looking at the sidebar, under the chatterbox, and realized something [damian1301|I]'ve never noticed before.  Its the [Quests] section!  This hasn't been posted in since September 8.  It doesn't even look like theres a use for it anymore.  Or  there is?  Although the [reviews]-&gt;{books} section isn't bare anymore, and the [reviews]-&gt;{modules} isn't either, it could still use some sprucin' up.  [damian1301|I] always check out the modules that all you people do a good review for.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;

&lt;B&gt;5&lt;/b&gt;.  As another monk just posted, I agree that there should be a Perl Applications review/display page.  This could include things like: &lt;BR&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
A. Perl Editors.&lt;BR&gt;
B. Programs that run or compile Perl.&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
And anyother thing anyone could think of. Hmm...well on second thought...nevermind this suggestion :-)


&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;font size=2 face=tahoma&gt;&lt;i&gt;Wanna be perl hacker.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;small&gt;Dave AKA damian&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/font&gt;</field>
</data>
</node>
