<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="482785" title="Re^2: Quite confuse about using Class::DBI to implement Data Access Objects and Value Objects Design Patterns" created="2005-08-10 18:16:45" updated="2005-08-11 08:08:15">
<type id="11">
note</type>
<author id="260843">
monsieur_champs</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Be sure to ask him to submit all requests as UML diagrams, in triplicate, with TPS cover sheets and circles and arrows and a diagram on the back of each one.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the recommendation. I'm really well-served on bureaucracy, believe me. The client have a CMM L2 certification and all projects must fulfill a lot of bureaucratic requirements. :-(&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;On the other hand, if you want to keep your job, maybe digging a little deeper is the way to go here. Maybe your architect knows what he's doing. Maybe he has solid, concrete reasons for asking you to do this.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not really. He have a Java based mindset, just that. It's not his fault, he actually works with Java. [perrin] and [izut] arguments are enough to convince him about the non-need of VOs for implement a good DAO in Perl.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;The [http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-09-2000/jw-0915-lucene.html|Lucene] and [http://search.cpan.org/dist/Plucene|Plucene] examples&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for those. They were nice and very illustrative. It started to show the light to my poor architect. :-) May the [gods] [bless] you for this example and him for accepting it as a good starting point.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;And the Java guys would rightfully snear and make posts very similar to yours.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh, please! I'm not sneaking. I'm posting this with the agreement of my architect. We are good friends, and both of us are having fun with this project. :-) &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW, thank you very much for you point of view, it was quite useful. And thanks to [perrin] and [izut] for pointing good solutions for avoid extra coding and still having high quality Perl code.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- Node text goes above. Div tags should contain sig only --&gt;
&lt;div class="pmsig"&gt;&lt;div class="pmsig-260843"&gt;
&lt;p align="right"&gt;&lt;small&gt;-- [monsieur_champs]&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</field>
<field name="root_node">
482728</field>
<field name="parent_node">
482740</field>
</data>
</node>
