note astroboy <p>Catalyst is much more advanced down the development path than Maypole, but personally, I prefer <a href="http://www.cgi-app.org">CGI::Appplication</a> because it's easier to learn, but the sheer volume of <a href="http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/cgi-bin/cgi-app/index.cgi?Plugins">plugins</a> being added in the last few months gives you a level of functionality on a par with Catalyst.</p> <p>Catalyst has a steep learning curve IMHO, which is not helped by the documentation which seems a bit unstructured to me, but which obviously is sufficient for all those Catalyst programmers out there ... so I guess that it's personal taste.</p> <p>A comparison between CGI::Application and Catalyst can be found <a href ="http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/cgi-bin/cgi-app/index.cgi?CatalystCompared">here</a></p> 485248 485248