<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="53944" title="Considerations of Nodes To Consider" created="2001-01-24 10:59:03" updated="2005-08-10 16:57:44">
<type id="1036">
monkdiscuss</type>
<author id="5348">
Corion</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
&lt;P&gt;There was a request to create more accountability and/or discussion
as to why a node was put on the [Nodes To Consider]. Our
[vroom|allmighty and forethinking master] already included
a simple way to make (optional) accountability possible,
here is how I use the "Reason to consider"-edit box :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;CODE&gt;
  ([Corion]) This node has personal attacks, which have no place here.
&lt;/CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The engine then turns this on the [Nodes To Consider] page into
&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;
Reason: ([Corion]) This node has personal attacks, which have no place here. 
&lt;/P&gt;
If somebody then browses the [Nodes To Consider], my nick is
there and I can be easily contacted for further discussion
on this node and my request.
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The good thing about this is, that it is completely voluntary,
if you don't want any discussion about why you proposed
a node for editing or as food for the [NodeReaper|dark one],
you don't need to put your name there.
&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any comments / other suggestions are welcome !&lt;/P&gt;</field>
</data>
</node>
