<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="678975" title="Re^3: Why Change?" created="2008-04-08 09:23:39" updated="2008-04-08 05:23:39">
<type id="11">
note</type>
<author id="85580">
dragonchild</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
Abigail was the person I was thinking of. "qualms" doesn't preclude "heavily in favor". I know brian's got reservations, as do I, but I haven't heard anything from brian regarding not supporting Perl6. I also remember talking with Adam about his qualms, but I thought most of them had been addressed. Granted, this was YAPC::NA::2006, so I could be out of date.
&lt;p&gt;The point still remains, even if I may overstated it a bit. The Perl5 devs and CPAN authors, as a group, are heavily in favor of how Perl6 is progressing, both in terms of deliverables and and in terms of process. If you want, I would be delighted to take a poll on the matter.
&lt;p&gt;As for apology, there is nothing to apologize for. We had a discussion. You feel strongly one way and I feel strongly another. We've had these several times over the past 6+ years we've known each other. If you feel there's something I need to apologize for, I would be honored to discuss it via email - rkinyon@cpan.org
&lt;!-- Node text goes above. Div tags should contain sig only --&gt;
&lt;div class="pmsig"&gt;&lt;div class="pmsig-85580"&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
My criteria for good software:
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Does it work?
&lt;li&gt;Can someone else come in, make a change, and be reasonably certain no bugs were introduced?
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</field>
<field name="root_node">
678649</field>
<field name="parent_node">
678939</field>
</data>
</node>
