note blazar <blockquote><i>I find that a lot harder to read. [...] If you want to conditionally include only one thing in a much larger unconditional list it really breaks down.</i></blockquote> <p><em>I personally believe</em> that ease of reading is in the eye of the beholder, but as far as the second remark is concerned, of course it's fully seconded++. Long story made short - IMHO: no clear-cut, all encompassing solution. Just many different situations. (And incidentally, nothing which will take our sleeping away, I hope! ;)</p> <div class="pmsig"><div class="pmsig-409850"> <small><c>-- </c><br/> If you can't understand the [wp://incipit], then please check the <strong>[http://blazar.tumblr.com/post/17639246|IPB Campaign]</strong>.</small> </div></div> 564792 698788