<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="736772" title="Re^2: Quote and Quote-like Operators" created="2009-01-16 03:35:17" updated="2009-01-16 03:35:17">
<type id="11">
note</type>
<author id="29008">
grinder</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
&lt;p&gt;I used slash (/) delimiters for the longest time in my code, until it dawned on me that using a vi-compatible delimiter pair would allow me to bounce on the % key to go from the beginning to the end. (I believe this is written somewhere in the Perl documentation).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As a result, &lt;tt&gt;qw()&lt;/tt&gt; has become my preferred idiom, as has qq{}. Looking back at older code these days I find that &lt;tt&gt;q/a string/&lt;/tt&gt; lacks symmetry, and thus beauty.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Getting back to the OP, &lt;i&gt;isn't it much better if everyone uses these operators exactly in the way they are described in Perl manuals&lt;/i&gt;, I would say yes, that's a sensible default. But one should know when (and why) to break the rules.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="pmsig"&gt;&lt;div class="pmsig-29008"&gt;
&lt;p align="right"&gt;&lt;font size="-2"&gt;&amp;bull; another intruder with the mooring in the heart of the Perl&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</field>
<field name="root_node">
736637</field>
<field name="parent_node">
736648</field>
</data>
</node>
