note
BrowserUk
<blockquote><i>won't get written faster by people asking about it</i></blockquote>
<p>That was kinda my point.
<blockquote><i>or complaining that it isn't written yet. </i></blockquote>
<P>By which you're implying that I should try my head for size in the hat of the non-contributor, and thence align myself in the sights of the fickle finger of blame.
<P>But if you wish to go that route, then you should consider the numbers of non-contributors--and more importantly--the numbers of ex-contributors, and ask the question: Why so many of the tens of thousands(?) that were caught up with the Pugs initiative fell by the wayside.
<blockquote><i>For that to happen, you need to encourage (some would say "hype") people into wanting to contribute. </i></
blockquote>
<P>And finally...that is exactly the point I was making. Each time the OP appears, (has to be asked), and the response is so low-key and dismissive, la petite mort goes a little deeper; spreads a little further; lasts a little longer.
<div class="pmsig"><div class="pmsig-171588">
<hr />
<font size=1 >
<div>Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.</div>
<div>"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". </div>
<div>In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.</div>
<div>[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/03/exploding_donkey/|"I'd rather go naked than blow up my ass"]</div>
</font>
</div></div>
815428
815551