note linuxer <p>Yes, that cleared it up. Thanks for that. <p>Ok, though I understand that now, I think, that <i>"similar to @+"</i> should be rephrased to be more concrete what is meant (or may it even be left out? Is it really necessary?). <p>added: <p>If I read [doc://perlvar] from the beginning to end, as we can see, I don't recognize this "similarity" of <c>@+</c> and <c>%+</c>. <c>@-</c> is explained a few paragraphes later in the document, so hasn't been read yet. I don't think, it's clear enough (in the doc). 820991 821002