note Corion <p>I'm not sure that reviving some six year old thread is the best apporoach to get an answer from [Juerd] about the module. I'm not privy to [metaperl]s intentions, but if they are to get bugs fixed, the approach taken strikes me as somewhat odd. The bugs are not reported via the traditional bug reporting venue, <c>rt.cpan.org</c>, but hidden in the last point of the post, seemingly copied from some other email without showing care about the formulation. [Metaperl] is aware of the traditional venue for reporting bugs. If there is doubt in whether RT is used by [Juerd], maybe that question could have been cleared by email. </p><p>If the intent is to antagonize [Juerd] or to vent the [metaperl]s disappointment, I understand the cathartical effect, but I disagree with the idea of doing so here.</p> <p>If the intent is to take over maintenance of the module, [metaperl] should maybe have mentioned that as a constructive way of resolving the issue.</p> <p>I get the impression of an air of entitlement of [metaperl] to a speedy response, as [metaperl] mentions lack of reaction within 48 hours multiple times. I'm not sure this sense of entitlement or disregard for the personal situation of [Juerd] (whatever it might be) warrants anything else than mocking. And, on a more serious side, if you really need an SLA with a reaction time below 48 hours after reporting an error, I think you <i>will</i> need to talk to the author about arranging such an agreement with compensate remuneration. </p> 357506 917890