note
tye
<p>
No, of course it would not be an "additional feature" request. It would be an <em>original</em> feature request. "This code doesn't have feature $X" is not the same as "This code is buggy". Failing to implement required features makes the code incomplete. It doesn't mean the code contains any bugs.
</p><p>
Code being bug-free obviously does not mean that there are no features that it leaves unsatisfied.
</p><p>
But the empty program successfully implements the following important features:
</p><p>
<ol><li>Compiles without errors
</li><li>Validates all required inputs
</li><li>Reproduces itself
</li><li>Does not allow any SQL injection attacks
</li><li>Produces all output in UTF-16
</li><li>Produces all output in 7-bit ASCII
</li><li>Produces all output in Big5
</li><li>Logs detailed error reports if any operation it attempts fails
</li><li>Exits immediately if used as part of any illegal or immoral activity
</li><li>All output is automatically translated into the viewer's native language, even if there are multiple simultaneous viewers
</li><li>All network communication is encrypted so that not only can the NSA never decrypt a single byte of it, they can't even detect it
</li></ol></p>
<div class="pmsig"><div class="pmsig-22609"><p align="right">
- [tye]<tt> </tt>
</p></div></div>
923913
924013