<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="929503" title="Re^13: to distinguish between [Anonymous Monk]s in a thread, brand 'em" created="2011-10-04 06:39:28" updated="2011-10-04 06:39:28">
<type id="11">
note</type>
<author id="352046">
ww</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
Seems to me that their '&lt;i&gt;"indistinguishableness"&lt;/i&gt;' -- at the level you're invoking it as something to protect -- is not and never has been the point of permitting individuals to post as AM nor is it an essential element of anonymity in the context of the Monastery.

&lt;p&gt;Rather, the point, IMO, is to allow any persons to post what they wish, &lt;b&gt;without providing any link between their statement (opinion, rant, slurs, facts, code, whatever) and their actual personal identities&lt;/b&gt; or, as you suggested earlier, any link between the statement and the writer's individual semi-anonymous handle (CountZero, ww, etc.) But AM is not an individual handle; it's used by many different (but equally anonymous) individuals&lt;b&gt;&lt;sup&gt;*1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;center&gt; - - - - - - - - - - - - - &lt;/center&gt;
&lt;b&gt;&lt;sup&gt;*1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/b&gt; ....or so we may presume, given the varying competence with Perl, English, spelling, grammar, and so on that we can readily observe.</field>
<field name="root_node">
924794</field>
<field name="parent_node">
929459</field>
</data>
</node>
