<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="943218" title="POD to CPAN to POD?" created="2011-12-12 19:32:09" updated="2011-12-12 19:32:09">
<type id="115">
perlquestion</type>
<author id="79942">
jgamble</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
&lt;p&gt;Before I get into the gist of my question, I'd like to direct your attention to [mod://Math::Fractal::Noisemaker], in particular the NOISE TYPES section. If you are viewing this in HTML, you will see nice graphics demonstrating the different types of fractal noise.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This was a nice idea that I immediately wanted to steal, so I looked at the author's POD code, and found that between "=begin HTML" and "=end HTML" sections he put an img tag pointing to jpeg on a github server.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Irrationally, I found this to be a little disappointing. To my mind, it would seem more elegant to have a CPAN document refer back to CPAN instead of a separate site. Thinking it over, I wondered if it made sense. Could a POD parser refer back to the module it was documenting? If I put an "images" directory in my package, could I have an HTML tag referring back to a directory that doesn't exist until PAUSE creates it?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I expect the answer is "no" (or even "hell no"), but I thought I'd run the idea by the perlmonk community. Stupid idea? Nice idea that's too tricky to get implemented? Or... possible to do?&lt;/p&gt;
</field>
</data>
</node>
