<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="953744" title="Re^5: Sometimes Perl is awesome: Duck Duck Go edition (!g tracking)" created="2012-02-14 13:44:47" updated="2012-02-14 13:44:47">
<type id="11">
note</type>
<author id="5842">
PrakashK</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
&lt;p&gt;You are quite right about the redirecting to Google. The redirection is, however, done by the HTTP Refresh header,  rather than via the more common 3xx HTTP Status code.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, Google does not seem to tie the search request to me, at least looking at the search results page. When I am logged in to Google+, I performed a search directly on Google. The results page showed that Google took my online presence into account, as evidenced by the google-bar with my name, and results from Google+ circles etc. I see 8 cookies from google.com and 14 cookies from plus.google.com.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Repeating the same search via DDG !g syntax, while still logged in to Google+, I see a different page, with the google-bar asking me to sign in, and generic results from Google+. So, in this case, Google did not associate the search request to my Google account. Also, I see only 8 cookies and no cookies from plus.google.com.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is what I meant by "no-tracking" (poor choice of words, I admit).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is possible that Google could derive some kind of link to me by IP tracking or other means, but they do not &lt;em&gt;seem&lt;/em&gt; to be doing it.&lt;/p&gt;</field>
<field name="root_node">
952336</field>
<field name="parent_node">
953735</field>
</data>
</node>
