note mmartin Hey aaron_baugher,<br> <br> Thanks for the reply..!<br> <br> Now that I think about, I guess I kinda gave a bad example. For the values that might be duplicated, they would be integers which "should" be added together and then stored into the hash. So I guess there wouldn't be a value that has more than one value for particular record.<br> <br> With this new info do you still think it's necessary to do a hash of hashes still?<br> <br> Thanks,<br> Matt<br> <br> <br> 955162 955181