<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="964026" title="RFC: Review of &quot;Seekers of Perl Wisdom&quot; description?" created="2012-04-08 16:16:12" updated="2012-04-08 16:16:12">
<type id="1036">
monkdiscuss</type>
<author id="907377">
i5513</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
Dear Monks,&lt;br&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While I was browsing the monastery, I found my [id://963972|last comment] (basically a reply which says, "please search in internet before posting") with negative reputation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My first impression was "waw! what did I wrong??"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now reading [http://perlmonks.org/?node_id=237057#sopw|"Seekers of Perl Wisdom"] description, I understand it. Description does not invite to do any research before posting the question, so some monks sees my reply with wrong eyes (or maybe there are other issues which I possibly missed?)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What I'm proposing here is updating the description. I can understand that search engine wasn't very powerful when Perlmonks started. But now it is another history.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I think monastery could replace this part of the description (of course if other monks agree and there is a consensus):&lt;/p&gt;

Original:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;/If you have a question on how to do something in Perl/ ...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Modified (or somethink like it):&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;$&amp; ,and you did not find the reply to your question in a fast search in Internet, perldoc, or supersearch ... &lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What do you think about?&lt;/p&gt;

Thank you!</field>
</data>
</node>
