<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<node id="969803" title="Re: &quot;The Work of a Stranger ...&quot;" created="2012-05-10 08:14:49" updated="2012-05-10 08:14:49">
<type id="11">
note</type>
<author id="63250">
gregor42</author>
<data>
<field name="doctext">
&lt;p&gt;It is for precisely this reason why I am one of those truly annoying people who actually writes (a lot of) comments.  I have come back to code after as few as 6 months &amp; not recognized it whatsoever.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;(Dons Flame-retardant suit)&lt;/i&gt; This is especially true of perl code, since TIMTOWTDI, I often change my approach based on my latest definition of "elegant"...
&lt;p&gt;Upon reflection it occurs to me that when writing in a language that is new to me I often write pseudo-code skeletons in comments which I then fill in with the proper syntax once I figure out how to make it work.  What I find interesting is that it's not a bad approach to take in general, but I seem to lose interest when fluency sets in.
&lt;!-- Node text goes above. Div tags should contain sig only --&gt;
&lt;div class="pmsig"&gt;&lt;div class="pmsig-63250"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Wait! This isn't a Parachute, this is a Backpack!&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</field>
<field name="root_node">
969706</field>
<field name="parent_node">
969706</field>
</data>
</node>
