note
wanna_code_perl
<p>Yes, but it performed slightly worse than xz, most likely because it uses the same compression algorithm.</p>
<code>
-rw-r--r-- 1 469K 10 Sep 19:33 accel_packed.7z
-rw-r--r-- 1 559K 10 Sep 19:33 accel_packed.bz2
-rw-r--r-- 1 559K 10 Sep 19:33 accel_packed.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 468K 10 Sep 19:33 accel_packed.xz
-rw-r--r-- 1 560K 10 Sep 19:33 accel_packed.zip
# Uncompressed file, packed with Csss/CLsss:
-rw-r--r-- 1 701K 10 Sep 18:34 accel_packed.dat
</code>
<p>These are all about +/- 10%. Unless there's a significantly different and amazing general compression algorithm I haven't considered, I would imagine these results won't improve much, which is why I'm asking here to see if there's a way I can further optimize the data itself.</p>
992886
992892