Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw

Perl Monks Discussion

( #1040=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

This section is only for discussing issues pertaining to the PerlMonks web site. You can ask about how things work, or offer ideas on how the site could be improved, for example.

Unless the topic pertains to the PerlMonks web site, it does not belong in this section. If you're unsure, check out Where should I post X? and The Perl Monks Guide to the Monastery, or ask in the chatterbox.

PerlMonks Discussions
Is there a policy on updating RFCs?
1 direct reply — Read more / Contribute
by RonW
on Jun 30, 2014 at 16:12

    I have posted an RFC in Meditations. I have made some significant updates to it, but updated nodes don't seem to count as "new". I hesitate to post a new meditation as I don't want to spam PM.

    I have searched the FAQ and PM discussions, but I may have missed something.

missing cookie from/for
6 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by Anonymous Monk
on Jun 20, 2014 at 04:14

    Hello it's Danny, when i visit my browser sends the following cookie along withe the GET request:

    Cookie: blnx=; __utma=243798916.2119672792.1403198838.1403242929.1403245114.4; __utmz=243798916.1403198838.1.1.utmcsr=(direct)|utmccn=(direct)|utmcmd=(none); __ctxpop=1; __iswl_wwwperlmonkscom=0; userpass=; __utmc=243798916.

    Where does that cookie come from, because it cannot be set by the server it appears, and its missing from my cookiejar, if i visit perlmonks with a cookie-test program, fe using www::mechanize. Sure hope you can help me because im unable to find adequate documentation about this.

headline tags?
5 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by LanX
on Jun 07, 2014 at 13:02
    Why do we allow <h1> tags at all?

    See Unlink not deleting, Threading issue? again...

    The board rules discourage using them¹, but we could either

    • disable H1 ... H3
    • or smoothen them by CSS
    I'm fully aware ofmy freedom to adjust my personal CSS in the settings and share them here...

    But do we really need the resulting discussion after someone misbehaved again?


    To give all of this a more productive turn...

    Any CSS-suggestions for H1..H3?

    Such that they are

    • acceptably large
    • still "more prominent" than H4
    • w/o downsizing H4..H6 (backwards compatibility for older posts)

    Cheers Rolf

    (addicted to the Perl Programming Language)


    ¹) Heading tags, <h3>...</h3>, and smaller (through <h6>) may be used


    just noticed that H3 is still accepted here, so please rethink the ranges I suggested

Clarification of Consideration - minor addition suggested
2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by wjw
on Jun 04, 2014 at 13:43

    In How does Nodes to Consider work?, it would be helpful, I think, to clarify the section showing:

    • four radio buttons, labeled 'keep', 'edit', 'reap', and 'nada' (the default).
    • the requestor and text of the consideration.

    Suggested Content:

    • four radio buttons, labeled 'keep', 'edit', 'reap', and 'nada' (the default).
      Don't modify in any way. Leave it alone.
      Suggest the OP (or the Janitors) modify the posting as suggested by the considering Monk.
      Completely remove the node under consideration.
      I don't want to vote on this consideration right now, maybe later.
    • the requester and text of the consideration.

    The same might be helpful in How do I use the power of consideration responsibly? as well?

    ...the majority is always wrong, and always the last to know about it...

    Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results...

    A solution is nothing more than a clearly stated problem...otherwise, the problem is not a problem, it is a facct

Proposal - Update shortcuts pointing to to link to
4 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by marto
on Jun 03, 2014 at 07:07
Code tags vs Readmore
4 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by chacham
on May 23, 2014 at 07:20

    There are a couple things i wonder about, from time to time, about the code tag. One, the width makes a lot of code wrap when on my screen there is no need. Two, code can get longer and i wish it were a readmore tag instead.

    The code tag seems to wrap at 70 characters, is that to support terminals? Perhaps that could be an option, so those with wider screens have the option of seeing it unwrapped.

    The readmore tag is intended to keep a post from being too long. Yet, though a code tag pretties it up, it does not shorten it. Leaving it long certainly allows for quicker reading on the page, though it hinders getting to the start of the next post.

    Just some thoughts.

Some more modern forum engine?
6 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by llancet
on May 03, 2014 at 22:44

    As a user, I think there are at least two disadvantages on the design of perlmonks forum:

    There are too many objects on the right side.

    Does not support uploading pictures.

    It seems the use of JavaScript are avoided. Is it the reason that we can only have such plain pages? Maybe you can find some forum engine which can render two sets of pages: one only plain HTML, the other one with the full use of CSS, JS, HTML5, etc.

Permission Denied?
3 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by Anonymous Monk
on Apr 28, 2014 at 14:38

    Dear Monks,

    Sometimes when I try to post (reply to a question, most recently this one), I get the Permission Denied page, without any particular explanation. Any idea as to why?

    This does not happen on the Preview, which makes it somewhat frustrating to have just typed up and proofread a response and then not be able to post it.

    Thanks in advance.

chk boxes in chatterbox
2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by HarryPutnam
on Apr 25, 2014 at 18:10
    What is supposed to happen when you check the boxes in chatterbox?

    I took it to be some way to make sense of the confusing flow of messages in various thread, and assumed once checked, that box would disappear, allowing you to keep up with the responses you've read

    After fiddling with it for a while... I really don't see what it does at all.

Some better way to read/post/follow threads
2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by HarryPutnam
on Apr 25, 2014 at 18:01
    There seems to be a real wealth of knowledge on PerlMonks.

    I'm quite a new user... and find the interface for reading and posting in threads is difficult to follow. After just scanning briefly thru some of the setup stuff, I saw no section devoted to how threads are presented.

    Hopefully I'm just blind to seeing how to set things up in some way I can follow better. If so I hope some kind Monk will steer me toward the relevant information.

    Is it possible to connect with the various forums, thru NNTP? And use them like regular usenet is setup?

    Is it possible, thru personal settings or whatever to get my group reading interface to resemble the one available on gmane. With Frames and threading so the groups appear in the tried and venerable style of usenet

Pretify the site with CSS?
5 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by Anonymous Monk
on Apr 23, 2014 at 14:12
    Can you suggest and share some custom made CSS examples that make Perl Monks more pleasing to the eye and easier to read ?
OpenSSL Status
2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by papidave
on Apr 19, 2014 at 18:33
    Inasmuch as Heartbleed is forcing admins all over the internet to patch their servers, and inasmuch as it's considered wise to change one's passwords after said patching, I'm wondering if PM:
    1. was ever vulnerable to the OpenSSL issue known as Heartbleed, and
    2. if we're all patched, so I can reset my password.

    Thanks muchly,


propose updating node about linking to cpan modules
4 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by Lotus1
on Apr 16, 2014 at 11:34

2 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
by milan.dalwadi
on Apr 11, 2014 at 03:07
    To front page or not ? [ANSWERED]
    5 direct replies — Read more / Contribute
    by Bloodnok
    on Apr 10, 2014 at 06:35
      Greetings fellow approvers,

      Pray tell, what are the considerations &/or constraints to be applied when deciding whether, or not, to front page a node ?


      Many thanks to the respondents - it's all much clearer now ... for a Friday :-)

      A user level that continues to overstate my experience :-))

    Discussion Item
    Give us your input:
    Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
    and:  <code> code here </code>
    to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":

  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • Outside of code tags, you may need to use entities for some characters:
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (6)
    As of 2014-11-26 06:59 GMT
    Find Nodes?
      Voting Booth?

      My preferred Perl binaries come from:

      Results (163 votes), past polls