Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks Joe
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

What's the difference between calling a function as &foo and foo()?

by faq_monk (Initiate)
on Oct 08, 1999 at 00:27 UTC ( #699=perlfaq nodetype: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

Current Perl documentation can be found at perldoc.perl.org.

Here is our local, out-dated (pre-5.6) version:

When you call a function as &foo, you allow that function access to your current @_ values, and you by-pass prototypes. That means that the function doesn't get an empty @_, it gets yours! While not strictly speaking a bug (it's documented that way in the perlsub manpage), it would be hard to consider this a feature in most cases.

When you call your function as &foo(), then you do get a new @_, but prototyping is still circumvented.

Normally, you want to call a function using foo(). You may only omit the parentheses if the function is already known to the compiler because it already saw the definition (use but not require), or via a forward reference or use subs declaration. Even in this case, you get a clean @_ without any of the old values leaking through where they don't belong.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (14)
As of 2014-04-18 11:33 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (466 votes), past polls