Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Super Search

by gods
on Feb 24, 2000 at 22:18 UTC ( #3989=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


Found 50 nodes roughly between 2016-09-29 and 2016-09-15 (searched 0.10% of DB).


where title contains "ey"

Date:Author/owner:Title:Node type:
2016-09-22 tybalt89 Re^4: Parsing with perl - Regexes and beyond Re:Med
2016-09-22 Discipulus Re^3: Parsing with perl - Regexes and beyond Re:Med
2016-09-22 Lucas Rey Lucas Rey's scratchpad SPad
2016-09-22 Lucas Rey Lucas Rey User
2016-09-21 Anonymous Monk Re^14: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-21 RonW Re^13: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-21 perl-diddler Re^10: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? (browser) Re:PMD
2016-09-20 perl-diddler Re^12: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-20 tye Re^9: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? (browser) Re:PMD
2016-09-20 BrowserUk Re^3: Parsing with perl - Regexes and beyond Re:Med
2016-09-20 BrowserUk Re^3: Parsing with perl - Regexes and beyond Re:Med
2016-09-20 hippo Re^11: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-20 RonW Re^11: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-20 tybalt89 Re^2: Parsing with perl - Regexes and beyond Re:Med
2016-09-20 Your Mother Re^9: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-20 perl-diddler Re^10: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-20 perl-diddler Re^10: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-20 RonW Re^3: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-20 RonW Re^4: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-20 RonW Re^9: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-20 RonW Re^9: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-20 choroba Re^9: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-20 hippo Re^9: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-20 perl-diddler Re^8: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-19 RonW Re^7: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-19 stevieb Re: How to fix the BerkeleyDB 52G data ? Re:SoPW
2016-09-19 davido Re: How to fix the BerkeleyDB 52G data ? Re:SoPW
2016-09-19 Perl_Love How to fix the BerkeleyDB 52G data ? SoPW
2016-09-18 Anonymous Monk Re^2: Parsing with perl - Regexes and beyond Re:Med
2016-09-18 perl-diddler Re^6: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-17 LanX Re^4: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-17 choroba Re^3: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-17 perl-diddler Re^6: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-17 Your Mother Re^3: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-17 $h4X4_|=73}{ Re^2: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-16 RonW Re^5: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-16 perl-diddler Re^4: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-16 choroba Re^4: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-15 Anonymous Monk Re^3: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-15 RonW Re^3: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-15 kcott Re^5: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-15 perl-diddler Re^4: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-15 kcott Re^3: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-15 kcott Re^3: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-15 Anonymous Monk Re^3: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-15 perl-diddler Re^2: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-15 perl-diddler Re^2: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-15 Anonymous Monk Re: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-15 kcott Re: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD
2016-09-15 choroba Re: BUG: code blocks don't retain literal formatting -- could they? Re:PMD

Press to continue searching remaining 99.90% of DB.
Please be patient after submitting your search.


Reset search form

Match text containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)
titles against above.

New Please be patient after submitting your search.

Match titles containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)

authors
(use "[one] [two]" to list multiple authors)
(Searching by author doesn't work for Categorized Questions and Answers yet.)

Search ,
starting at - - .

Search
the following sections:

Skip text containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)
(Does not exclude based on titles)

Skip titles containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)






parent node's author
(use "[one] [two]" to list multiple authors)
(This doesn't work for Categorized Questions and Answers yet.)

New Please be patient after submitting your search.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (11)
As of 2016-09-29 19:50 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Extraterrestrials haven't visited the Earth yet because:







    Results (560 votes). Check out past polls.