Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

Super Search

( #3989=superdoc: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


Found 50 nodes roughly between 2014-08-01 and 2013-08-01 (searched 4.41% of DB).


where title contains "say"

2014-07-16 Anonymous Monk Re^2: Why do people say 'Perl' is dead?!?! Re:SoPW
2014-06-26 sayadav sayadav's scratchpad SPad
2014-06-26 sayadav sayadav User
2014-06-01 chrisayres11 chrisayres11's scratchpad SPad
2014-06-01 chrisayres11 chrisayres11 User
2014-05-15 wjw Re^6: At the risk of saying something stupid-but-obvious about Roman Numerals Re:Med
2014-05-15 mr_mischief Re^5: At the risk of saying something stupid-but-obvious about Roman Numerals Re:Med
2014-05-14 mr_mischief Re^3: At the risk of saying something stupid-but-obvious about Roman Numerals Re:Med
2014-05-13 sundialsvc4 Re^4: At the risk of saying something stupid-but-obvious about Roman Numerals Re:Med
2014-05-13 BrowserUk Re^3: At the risk of saying something stupid-but-obvious about Roman Numerals Re:Med
2014-05-13 sundialsvc4 Re^2: At the risk of saying something stupid-but-obvious about Roman Numerals Re:Med
2014-05-13 mr_mischief Re: At the risk of saying something stupid-but-obvious about Roman Numerals Re:Med
2014-05-12 sundialsvc4 Re^3: At the risk of saying something stupid-but-obvious about Roman Numerals Re:Med
2014-05-12 Anonymous Monk Re^2: At the risk of saying something stupid-but-obvious about Roman Numerals Re:Med
2014-05-12 wjw Re^2: At the risk of saying something stupid-but-obvious about Roman Numerals Re:Med
2014-05-12 eyepopslikeamosquito Re^2: At the risk of saying something stupid-but-obvious about Roman Numerals Re:Med
2014-05-12 sundialsvc4 Re: At the risk of saying something stupid-but-obvious about Roman Numerals Re:Med
2014-05-12 Limbic~Region Re: At the risk of saying something stupid-but-obvious about Roman Numerals Re:Med
2014-05-12 Anonymous Monk Re^2: At the risk of saying something stupid-but-obvious about Roman Numerals Re:Med
2014-05-12 roboticus Re: At the risk of saying something stupid-but-obvious about Roman Numerals Re:Med
2014-05-12 sundialsvc4 At the risk of saying something stupid-but-obvious about Roman Numerals Med
2014-04-29 BrowserUk Re^6: how to access elements in perl (for the naysayers) Re:SoPW
2014-04-28 BrowserUk Re^4: how to access elements in perl (for the naysayers) Re:SoPW
2014-04-28 Anonymous Monk Re^5: how to access elements in perl (for the naysayers) Re:SoPW
2014-04-28 wjw Re^3: how to access elements in perl (for the naysayers) Re:SoPW
2014-04-28 karlgoethebier Re^4: how to access elements in perl (for the naysayers) Re:SoPW
2014-04-28 Anonymous Monk Re^3: how to access elements in perl (for the naysayers) Re:SoPW
2014-04-28 Anonymous Monk Re^3: how to access elements in perl (for the naysayers) Re:SoPW
2014-04-28 BrowserUk Re^2: how to access elements in perl (for the naysayers) Re:SoPW
2014-02-28 SimonSaysCake SimonSaysCake's scratchpad SPad
2014-02-28 SimonSaysCake SimonSaysCake User
2013-11-13 Your Mother Re^2: Why do people say 'Perl' is dead?!?! Re:SoPW
2013-11-13 morgon Re: Why do people say 'Perl' is dead?!?! Re:SoPW
2013-11-12 Anonymous Monk Re^2: Why do people say 'Perl' is dead?!?! Re:SoPW
2013-09-29 esaym esaym's scratchpad SPad
2013-09-29 esaym esaym User
2013-08-11 jabowery Re^2: Spawned debugger xterms say "sh: 1: 3: Bad file descriptor" (source) Re:SoPW
2013-08-11 tye Re: Spawned debugger xterms say "sh: 1: 3: Bad file descriptor" (source) Re:SoPW
2013-08-11 jabowery Re^2: Spawned debugger xterms say "sh: 1: 3: Bad file descriptor" Re:SoPW
2013-08-11 Loops Re: Spawned debugger xterms say "sh: 1: 3: Bad file descriptor" Re:SoPW
2013-08-11 jabowery Spawned debugger xterms say "sh: 1: 3: Bad file descriptor" SoPW
2013-08-09 saysuri saysuri's scratchpad SPad
2013-08-09 saysuri saysuri User
2013-08-05 Anonymous Monk Re^3: Say, are the Gates busted? Re:PMD
2013-08-05 Anonymous Monk Re^4: Say, are the Gates busted? Re:PMD
2013-08-05 sundialsvc4 Re^3: Say, are the Gates busted? Re:PMD
2013-08-05 sundialsvc4 Re^2: Say, are the Gates busted? Re:PMD
2013-08-05 Anonymous Monk Re^2: Say, are the Gates busted? Re:PMD
2013-08-05 sundialsvc4 Re: Say, are the Gates busted? Re:PMD
2013-08-01 Anonymous Monk Re^5: Say, are the Gates busted? (on 216.92.34.251 ) Re:PMD

Press to continue searching remaining 95.59% of DB.
Please be patient after submitting your search.


Reset search form

Match text containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)
titles against above.

New Please be patient after submitting your search.

Match titles containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)

authors
(use "[one] [two]" to list multiple authors)
(Searching by author doesn't work for Categorized Questions and Answers yet.)

Search ,
starting at - - .

Search
the following sections:

Skip text containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)
(Does not exclude based on titles)

Skip titles containing
(separate strings with -- default is spaces)






parent node's author
(use "[one] [two]" to list multiple authors)
(This doesn't work for Categorized Questions and Answers yet.)

New Please be patient after submitting your search.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (5)
As of 2014-08-01 04:20 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (256 votes), past polls