note
jlp
Slip, slide, slip, slide. Down the content control slope we go.
<br><br>
As some folks are aware, i am against the [editors] group in its current incarnation, the current [notes to consider|consideration] system, and i am against this as well.
<br>
<ul>
<li>This appears to have the same lack of accountability as the [editors] group
<li>Where does humor or satire become abuse? How is it decided? Another committee? Oh joy.
<li>"select set of users" how are they selected? fiat? open vote?
<li>I see no evidence that there is even a problem to begin with; what has [antivroom] done wrong?
</ul>
I am not prepared to support a system remotely like this; you will be punishing people for having a "position" (if you can call a nick a position) that people simply don't like. That is censorship, and i do not approve.
100052
100052