Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Variable as name of array

by johngg (Abbot)
on Nov 01, 2012 at 22:50 UTC ( #1001880=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Variable as name of array
in thread Variable as name of array

Yes, you could do that but a Perl-style loop (see Foreach Loops) might be more idiomatic than a C-style one (For Loops). In fact, for and foreach are synonymous and can both be used interchangeably for either style of loop.

$ perl -Mstrict -Mwarnings -MData::Dumper -E ' > my @names = qw{ A B C D }; > my %order; > foreach my $name ( @names ) > { > $order{ $name } = $name; > } > print Data::Dumper->Dumpxs( [ \ %order ], [ qw{ *order } ] );' %order = ( 'A' => 'A', 'D' => 'D', 'C' => 'C', 'B' => 'B' ); $

Another way to construct the hash would be to use a map instead of the foreach.

$ perl -Mstrict -Mwarnings -MData::Dumper -E ' > my @names = qw{ A B C D }; > my %order = map { $_ => $_ } @names; > print Data::Dumper->Dumpxs( [ \ %order ], [ qw{ *order } ] );' %order = ( 'A' => 'A', 'D' => 'D', 'C' => 'C', 'B' => 'B' ); $

I hope this is helpful.

Cheers,

JohnGG


Comment on Re^3: Variable as name of array
Select or Download Code
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Variable as name of array
by choroba (Canon) on Nov 01, 2012 at 22:56 UTC
    Or even, horrors, a slice:
    use Data::Dumper; my @names = qw/ A B C D /; my %order; @order{ @names } = @names; print Dumper \%order; __END__ Prints: $VAR1 = { 'A' => 'A', 'D' => 'D', 'C' => 'C', 'B' => 'B' };
    لսႽ ᥲᥒ⚪⟊Ⴙᘓᖇ Ꮅᘓᖇ⎱ Ⴙᥲ𝇋ƙᘓᖇ

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1001880]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (19)
As of 2015-07-28 19:54 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (258 votes), past polls